Home > Profile > Our News > 11 Jan 2016

We represent the parents, whose son was the Respondent (the Husband) in a divorce suit. The parents joined as parties in their son’s divorce suit (FCMC 16239/2013). The reason for our clients’ intervention was that the Husband held assets under his name on trust for either or both of his parents and the wife believed those assets belonged to the Husband beneficially and relied on the presumption of advancement. The trial judge accepted that our clients have discharged the required burden of proof, decided that the assets in questions are all their assets and the Husband has no beneficial interests in those assets.