We acted for the first respondent in HCAL85/2012 in resisting the petitioner, an incumbent legislator, in his application for extension of time in respect of his lodging an election petition against our client. Lam JA delivered judgment on 5 October 2012 ruling that since here is only one statement pleaded by the petitioner which was not struck out nor conceded, the petitioner’s case has no real prospect of success, the petitioner has no meritorious case to support an application for extension of time and in the interest of justice, the petition was dismissed.

http://cablev.i-cable.com/video/?id=133283&lang